Skip to main content
Download PDF

Outcomes of neonatal hypothermia among very low birth weight infants: a Meta-analysis

Maternal Health, Neonatology and Perinatology volume 7, Article number: 14 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Neonatal admission hypothermia (HT) is a frequently encountered problem in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) and it has been linked to a higher risk of mortality and morbidity. However, there is a disparity in data in the existing literature regarding the prevalence and outcomes associated with HT in very low birth weight (VLBW) infants. This review aimed to provide further summary and analyses of the association between HT and adverse clinical outcomes in VLBW infants.

Methods

In July 2020, we conducted this review according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. A systematic database search was conducted in MEDLINE (PubMed), Google Scholar, ScienceDirect, World Health Organization Virtual Health Library, Cochrane Library databases, and System for Information on Grey Literature in Europe (SIGLE). We included studies that assessed the prevalence of HT and/or the association between HT and any adverse outcomes in VLBW infants. We calculated the pooled prevalence and Odds Ratio (OR) estimates with the corresponding 95% Confidence Interval (CI) using the Comprehensive meta-analysis software version 3.3 (Biostat, Engle-wood, NJ, USA; http://www.Meta-Analysis.com).

Results

Eighteen studies that fulfilled the eligibility criteria were meta-analyzed. The pooled prevalence of HT among VLBW infants was 48.3% (95% CI, 42.0–54.7%). HT in VLBW infants was significantly associated with mortality (OR = 1.89; 1.72–2.09), intra-ventricular hemorrhage (OR = 1.86; 1.09–3.14), bronchopulmonary dysplasia (OR = 1.28; 1.16–1.40), neonatal sepsis (OR = 1.47; 1.09–2.49), and retinopathy of prematurity (OR = 1.45; 1.28–1.72).

Conclusion

Neonatal HT rate is high in VLBW infants and it is a risk factor for mortality and morbidity in VLBW infants. This review provides a comprehensive view of the prevalence and outcomes of HT in VLBW infants.

Background

Neonatal deaths account for 40% of all under-five-years mortality and most of the deaths occur in developing countries [1, 2]. In particular, low birth weight accounts for 60–80% of all neonatal deaths [2]. Causes of neonatal mortality include complications of prematurity, infections, birth asphyxia, congenital anomalies, and others [3, 4].

Several studies have reported an association between neonatal admission hypothermia (HT) and increased risk of mortality and morbidity in VLBW infants [5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13]. These outcomes associated with HT are particularly evident in VLBW newborns due to their impaired and easily overwhelmed temperature regulatory mechanism, which is mainly due to high surface area to mass ratio, decreased subcutaneous fat, lack of shivering response, and inadequate brown fat [2, 10,11,12]. Laptook et al. found in an adjusted analysis that with each 1 °C decrease in body temperature of VLBW infants, sepsis and mortality risks increase by 11 and 28%, respectively [13].

According to the World Health Organization (WHO), HT is defined as a core body temperature of less than 36.5 °C and the severity is sub-classified into three grades: Cold stress or mild HT (36.0–36.4 °C), moderate HT (32.0–35.9 °C), and severe HT (less than 32 °C) [14]. For each of these classifications, there are guidelines in place for responding to or managing HT [15]. Risk factors for HT include low gestational age, asphyxia, improper control of the thermal environment, inadequate breastfeeding, mode and place of delivery [16,17,18,19]. In addition, De Almeida et al. showed that maternal HT prior to delivery nearly doubles the chance that a newly born infant will have HT at five minutes after birth, indicating that maternal thermal care is an important measure for the prevention of neonatal HT [20].

Management of HT is considered a cornerstone for neonatal resuscitation as it reduces rates of neonatal mortality and morbidity [2, 21, 22]. According to the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF), these interventions can reduce the outcomes of HT by 18–42% [21]. These interventions that have been proposed to prevent HT in newborn infants include using a plastic cap, polyethylene bag wrapping, thermal mattress, controlling the room temperature, and active warming during cesarean delivery [9, 17, 23, 24]. A quality improvement project on the implementation of thermoregulatory interventions showed a significant reduction of neonatal HT, which in turn improved neonatal outcomes [25].

There is disparity in reported data on the prevalence of HT in VLBW infants and the associated outcomes with HT despite the high burden of VLBW infant deliveries and HT [1, 11]. Therefore, we conducted this review to assess the burden and adverse clinical outcomes associated with HT among VLBW infants.

Methods

Search strategy and inclusion criteria

The methodology was developed from the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement [26]. We performed a systematic literature search using the electronic databases of MEDLINE (PubMed), Google Scholar, ScienceDirect, WHO Virtual health library, Cochrane Library databases, and System for Information on Grey Literature in Europe (SIGLE) without limitations regarding sex, race, geographical area, or publication date. The search terms used were “low birth weight”, “very low birth weight”, “LBW”, “VLBW”, “hypothermia”, and “low body temperature”. Also, we reviewed the articles referenced by those identified articles in this search to ensure no possible relevant articles were missed.

The retrieved publications were imported into Rayyan software (QCRI, Doha, Qatar; http://rayyan.qcri.org) to expedite initial titles/abstracts screening and duplicates deletion [27]. The target population was the VLBW infants (those who were < 1500 g) and the criteria for articles inclusion were cross-sectional, case-control, or cohort studies that assessed the prevalence of HT and/or association between HT and any adverse outcome in VLBW infants. We excluded case reports, editorials, reviews, abstracts, non-English articles, and studies without sufficient data of interest. The titles and abstracts of all articles retrieved from this search were screened for potential inclusion in this review. Then, the full texts of studies deemed to be relevant were reviewed for inclusion according to the defined eligibility criteria.

Quality assessment and data extraction

Quality assessment of the included studies was done using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal checklists, which were set to assess the methodological quality of studies and to determine to what extent a study addressed the possibility of bias in study design, conduct, and data analysis [28]. Four independent reviewers extracted the relevant information using a designed data extraction form. Any disparity among the reviewers was resolved by discussion and consensus. For qualitative and quantitative data syntheses, we extracted the following information from each article and recorded them in a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet: authors, year of publication, study region, outcomes measured in the study, reference level used for definition of HT, number of VLBW infants, infants with HT, and infants with and without an adverse outcome in both hypothermic and non-hypothermic groups.

Statistical analysis

The statistical analyses were carried out by using Comprehensive meta-analysis software version 3.3 (Biostat, Engle-wood, NJ, USA; http://www.Meta-Analysis.com). The heterogeneity was assessed through I2 test, which describes the percentage of variability in the effect estimates. If high heterogeneity was detected, we calculated the pooled summary prevalence and OR from the random-effects models. We conducted a meta-regression analysis to determine the extent to which the continuous variables moderated the overall results. Publication bias was determined through Begg’s test, Egger’s test, and visual examination of the funnel plot [29, 30]. If a publication bias was found, the Duvall and Tweedie’s trim and fill method was used to add possible missing studies and to calculate the adjusted pooled value [31].

Results

Studies characteristics and prevalence of HT among VLBW infants

Our search retrieved records for 1840 published articles and the records screened after the removal of duplicates were 1438 articles. We excluded 1359 records in the title/abstracts screening phase after applying the exclusion criteria. Then, full texts of 79 studies were assessed for eligibility and quality. Lastly, a total of 18 studies conducted from 1981 to 2020 were included in the meta-analysis [5,6,7, 9,10,11,12,13, 20, 24, 32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39]. The studies selection process and the main findings are presented in (Fig. 1) and (Table. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flow chart for study selection process

Full size image
Table 1 Descriptive summary of the studies included in the review
Full size table

Among the 40,136 VLBW infants included in the analysis, the pooled prevalence of HT among VLBW infants was 48.3% (95% CI, 42.0–54.7%) (Fig. 2). No evidence of publication bias was detected based on examination of the funnel plot and from the results of Begg’s test (p = 0.35) and Egger’s test (p = 0.37) (Fig. 3). The meta-regression showed that the prevalence of HT was not affected by the study year (P = .721).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Pooled prevalence of HT among VLBW infants

Full size image
Fig. 3
figure 3

Funnel plot showing no evidence for publication bias among the studies included in this meta-analysis

Full size image

Risk of mortality among hypothermic VLBW infants

Eight studies had sufficient data to calculate the risk of death among hypothermic VLBW infants compared to the non-hypothermic VLBW population [5, 9,10,11, 20, 34, 37, 38]. The hypothermic VLBW infants have a higher risk of mortality with a pooled OR of 1.89 (95% CI, 1.72–2.09) (Fig. 4) (Table. 2). Duvall and Tweedie’s trim and fill method indicated three potential studies missing. However, the adjusted estimate was still significant and almost similar to the original findings after the virtual studies were appended, indicating that the result of this meta-analysis was steady (OR = 1.86, 95% CI, 1.69–2.05).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Pooled OR of Mortality NEC, IVH, BPD, Sepsis, and ROP among hypothermic VLBW infants

Full size image
Table 2 Meta-analyses of the adverse outcomes associated with HT in VLBW infants
Full size table

Risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) among hypothermic VLBW infants

Four studies had sufficient data to calculate the risk of NEC among hypothermic VLBW infants compared to the non-hypothermic VLBW population [5, 9, 10, 37]. There was no significant difference between the two groups and the pooled OR was 1.04 (95% CI, 0.89–1.21) (Fig. 4) (Table. 2). Duvall and Tweedie’s trim and fill method indicated one potential study missing. However, the adjusted estimate was still insignificant and almost similar to the original findings after the virtual study was appended, indicating that the result of this meta-analysis was steady (OR = 1.03, 95% CI, 0.76–1.42).

Risk of intra-ventricular hemorrhage (IVH) among hypothermic VLBW infants

Three studies had sufficient data to calculate the risk of developing IVH among hypothermic VLBW infants compared to the non-hypothermic VLBW population [5, 10, 11]. The hypothermic VLBW infants have a higher risk of IVH with a pooled OR of 1.86 (95% CI, 1.09–3.14) (Fig. 4) (Table. 2).

Risk of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) among hypothermic VLBW infants

Four studies with sufficient data to calculate the risk of BPD among hypothermic VLBW infants compared to the non-hypothermic VLBW population [5, 9, 35, 37]. The hypothermic VLBW infants have a higher risk of BPD with a pooled OR of 1.28 (95% CI, 1.16–1.40) (Fig. 4) (Table. 2). Duvall and Tweedie’s trim and fill method indicated one potential study missing and the adjusted estimate was (OR = 1.26, 95% CI, 0.95–1.69).

Risk of neonatal sepsis among hypothermic VLBW infants

Four studies with sufficient data to calculate the risk of neonatal sepsis among hypothermic VLBW infants compared to the non-hypothermic VLBW population [5, 9, 10, 37]. The hypothermic VLBW infants have a higher risk of sepsis with a pooled OR of 1.47 (95% CI, 1.09–2.49) (Fig. 4) (Table. 2).

Risk of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) among hypothermic VLBW infants

Four studies with sufficient data to calculate the risk of ROP among hypothermic VLBW infants compared to the non-hypothermic VLBW population [5, 10, 11, 36]. The hypothermic VLBW infants have a higher risk of ROP with a pooled OR of 1.45 (95% CI, 1.28–1.72) (Fig. 4) (Table. 2).

Discussion

In this review, we provided a comprehensive view of the prevalence of HT and its associated outcomes in VLBW infants. The prevalence of HT among VLBW infants was high and our result is close to a 2020-systematic review which reported that the prevalence of neonatal HT in East African countries was 57.2% [40]. Most of the studies included in our meta-analysis defined HT as axillary body temperature below 36.0 °C or 36.5 °C. There were two studies that used different cut-off points for the definition of HT; Audeh et al. found that 36.9% of the 271 VLBW infants in three Israeli centers had body temperature below 35.5 °C and Sodemann et al. in a cohort study conducted in Guinea-Bissau found that body temperature below 34.5 °C significantly increased the risk of death by approximately five times in the first 7 days of life [24, 39].

The adjusted multivariate analyses in the reviewed studies showed that HT was linked to increased risk of one or more adverse outcomes in VLBW infants, indicating that these findings were more than mere associations in the context of prematurity. Furthermore, Yu et al. showed that the correlation between HT and mortality was quadratic function equation and Lye et al. showed that the relationship between body temperature and adverse neonatal outcomes was U-shaped, in which the lowest rates of adverse outcomes were associated with the normal temperatures [5, 37].

These findings are explainable from the perspective of the pathophysiology of HT. Few studies provided potential explanations for the pathophysiological mechanisms by which neonatal HT lead to consequent mortality and adverse clinical outcomes [41]. It has been reported that HT affects virtually all systems causing wasting of the body’s stores of carbohydrate, protein, and fat due to the effect of the stress hormones such as cortisol and catecholamines, transient increased heart rate followed by bradycardia and serious electrocardiographic changes, decreased blood flow to the vital organs secondary to HT-mediated decrease in cardiac output, increased blood viscosity, and unpredictable fluctuations in serum electrolytes [41]. It has been shown that with prolongation of HT, the body’s oxygen consumption declines at a rate of 6% with each degree fall in body temperature with an inverse relationship between heat lost and serum glucose level [41].

The current review further confirmed the association of HT with VLBW neonatal deaths. The risk of mortality among hypothermic infants was reported as being highest within the first 7 days of life [11]. HT increased death rates by 39.5, 42, and 64% according to the findings of Guinsburg et al., Ting et al., and De Almeida et al., respectively [7, 12, 20]. Ogunlesi et al. showed that the case fatality rate (CFR) was significantly higher for hypothermic babies, especially in babies who weighed < 1 kg [32]. It is noteworthy that the incidence of mortality varied with varying degrees of HT [6]. A recent review showed that HT-associated mortality is related to the quality of neonatal care and it could be used as a quality indicator [42]. Simiyu et al. found that the mortality rate among low birth weight infants with HT was 84% [43]. In addition, a comparison of admission temperature between survivors and non-survivors showed a significant difference where the average body temperature was 35.4 °C and 34.8 °C respectively [44].

However, it is worth noting that attributing the poor neonatal outcome to HT might in some cases be tricky. In three groups of VLBW infants (750–999, 1000–1249, and 1250–1500 g) for instance as noted by Joelle et al., despite the significantly higher incidence of HT in the smallest infants compared to the (1250–1500 g) infants, HT was only significantly more common in the subgroup of infants who died in the larger groups, but not in the smallest infants group [45].

Our analysis concluded that there was an association between HT and IVH. Miller et al. found the association was with moderate HT specifically, whilst Yu et al. found the association with all types of HT [5, 6]. Guinsberg et al. found in their study that the IVH acquired by neonates due to HT was specifically of the IVH grade 3–4 [12].

Studies regarding NEC were controversial, and we did not detect an association between neonatal HT and NEC. Guinsburg et al. reported that NEC contributed synergistically to the development of unfavorable outcomes along with HT [12]. Caldas et al. described the significant protective association between admission HT and NEC like previous reports which showed that mild induced therapeutic HT may have some protective effect as rescue therapy for NEC in preterm infants [9].

Neonatal sepsis being linked to HT could be attributed to facts reported in the adult population undergoing surgery, where peri-operative HT was found to propagate post-operative infectious complications through temperature-mediated impaired immune function [13]. In a quality improvement project, the risk of nosocomial sepsis was significantly lowered in the period after the intervention to reduce neonatal HT [25]. However, a number of confounding factors have been established to contribute to the development of sepsis including the length of hospital stay and level of prematurity of the infant [36].

A limitation to be considered in this review is the paucity of publications on the associated outcomes with HT, which would be useful to reflect since several countries reported a high prevalence of neonatal HT, nonetheless still neglect the lack of thermal protection needed for newborn survival [2, 40, 41]. In such a situation, the magnitude of the burden would help emphasize the importance of interventional measures to be taken. Another limitation is the inclusion of studies published only in English, which could compromise representativeness. Lastly, data on the risk of several adverse outcomes were obtainable from few studies. There is a need for large prospective studies with appropriate controls to elaborate more on these issues.

Conclusions

Neonatal HT rate is high in VLBW infants and it is a vital risk factor for mortality and morbidity among them. Healthcare providers need to be aware of the clinically important association between HT and adverse clinical outcomes to ensure effective management.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

VLBW:

Very Low birth weight: HT: Hypothermia

NEC:

Necrotizing enterocolitis

IVH:

Intra-ventricular hemorrhage

ROP:

Retinopathy of prematurity

BPD:

Bronchopulmonary dysplasia

CFR:

Case fatality rate

References

  1. Amadi HO, Olateju EK, Alabi P, Kawuwa MB, Ibadin MO, Osibogun AO. Neonatal hyperthermia and thermal stress in low-and middle-income countries: a hidden cause of death in extremely low-birthweight neonates. Paediatr Int Child Health. 2015;35(3):273–81. https://doi.org/10.1179/2046905515Y.0000000030.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lunze K, Bloom DE, Jamison DT, Hamer DH. The global burden of neonatal hypothermia: systematic review of a major challenge for newborn survival. BMC Med. 2013;11(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-11-24.

  3. Black RE, Cousens S, Johnson HL, Lawn JE, Rudan I, Bassani DG, et al. Global, regional, and national causes of child mortality in 2008: a systematic analysis. Lancet. 2010;375(9730):1969–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60549-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bang AT, Reddy HM, Bang RA, Deshmukh MD. Why do neonates die in rural Gadchiroli, India? (Part II): Estimating population attributable risks and contribution of multiple morbidities for identifying a strategy to prevent deaths. J Perinatol. 2005;25 Suppl 1:S35–43. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jp.7211270.

  5. Yu YH, Wang L, Huang L, Wang LL, Huang XY, Fan XF, et al. Association between admission hypothermia and outcomes in very low birth weight infants in China: a multicentre prospective study. BMC Pediatr. 2020;20:321. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-020-02221-7.

  6. Miller SS, Lee HC, Gould JB. Hypothermia in very low birth weight infants: Distribution, risk factors and outcomes. J Perinatol. 2011;31 Suppl 1:S49–56. https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2010.177.

  7. Ting JY, Synnes AR, Lee SK, Shah PS. Association of admission temperature and death or adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes in extremely low-gestational age neonates. J Perinatol. 2018;38(7):844–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-018-0099-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Feldman A, de Benedictis B, Alpan G, la Gamma EF, Kase J. Morbidity and mortality associated with rewarming hypothermic very low birth weight infants. J Neonatal-Perinatal Med. 2016;9(3):295–302. https://doi.org/10.3233/NPM-16915143.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Caldas DSJP, Ferri WAG, Marba STM, Aragon DC, Guinsburg R, de Almeida MFB, et al. Admission hypothermia, neonatal morbidity, and mortality: evaluation of a multicenter cohort of very low birth weight preterm infants according to relative performance of the center. Eur J Pediatr. 2019;178(7):1023–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-019-03386-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chang HY, Sung YH, Wang SM, Lung HL, Chang JH, Hsu CH, et al. Short- and long-term outcomes in very low birth weight infants with admission hypothermia. PLoS One. 2015;10(7):e0131976. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0131976.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ng’eny JC, Velaphi S. Hypothermia among neonates admitted to the neonatal unit at a tertiary hospital in South Africa. J Perinatol. 2020;40(3):433–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-019-0539-y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Guinsburg R, de Almeida MFB, de Castro JS, Silveira RC, Caldas JPDS, Fiori HH, et al. Death or survival with major morbidity in VLBW infants born at Brazilian neonatal research network centers. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016;29(6):1005–9. https://doi.org/10.3109/14767058.2015.1031740.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Laptook AR, Salhab W, Bhaskar B. Admission temperature of low birth weight infants: Predictors and associated morbidities. Pediatrics. 2007;119(3):e643–9. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2006-0943.

  14. World Health Organization. Thermal protection of the newborn : a practical guide. Book [Internet]; 1997. p. 68. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/63986/WHO_RHT_MSM_97.2.pdf;jsessionid=4D411EC9439429CC27C36A844A1B811E?sequence=1

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mullany LC. Neonatal Hypothermia in Low-Resource Settings. Semin Perinatol. 2010;34:426–33.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Vohra S, Frent G, Campbell V, Abbott M, Whyte R. Effect of polyethylene occlusive skin wrapping on heat loss in very low birth weight infants at delivery: a randomized trial. J Pediatr. 1999;134(5):547–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3476(99)70238-6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hsu KH, Chiang MC, Lin SW, Lin JJ, Wang YC, Lien R. Thermal blanket to improve thermoregulation in preterm infants: a randomized controlled trial. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2015;16(7):637–43. https://doi.org/10.1097/PCC.0000000000000447.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Mullany LC, Katz J, Khatry SK, Leclerq SC, Darmstadt GL, Tielsch JM. Neonatal hypothermia and associated risk factors among newborns of southern Nepal [Internet]. BMC Med. 2010;8 Available from: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7015/8/43.

  19. Urubuto F, Agaba F, Choi J, Dusabimana R, Teteli R, Kumwami M, Conard C, O'Callahan C, Cartledge P. Prevalence, risk factors and outcomes of neonatal hypothermia at admission at a tertiary neonatal unit, Kigali, Rwanda - a cross-sectional study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2021;34(17):2793–800. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2019.1671334.

  20. de Almeida MF, Guinsburg R, Sancho GA, Rosa IR, Lamy ZC, Martinez FE, et al. Brazilian Network on Neonatal Research. Hypothermia and early neonatal mortality in preterm infants. J Pediatr. 2014;164(2):271–5.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2013.09.049.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Abd-El Hamid SA, Badr-El Din MM, Dabous NI, Saad KM. Effect of the use of a polyethylene wrap on the morbidity and mortality of very low birth weight infants in Alexandria university children’s hospital. J Egypt Public Health Assoc. 2012;87(5–6):104–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.EPX.0000421565.24496.d9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Perlman JM, Wyllie J, Kattwinkel J, Atkins DL, Chameides L, Goldsmith JP, Guinsburg R, Hazinski MF, Morley C, Richmond S, Simon WM, Singhal N, Szyld E, Tamura M, Velaphi S, Neonatal Resuscitation Chapter Collaborators. Part 11: neonatal resuscitation: 2010 international consensus on cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care science with treatment recommendations. Circulation. 2010;122(16 Suppl 2):S516–38. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.971127.

  23. Laptook AR, Bell EF, Shankaran S, Boghossian NS, Wyckoff MH, Kandefer S, et al. Admission Temperature and Associated Mortality and Morbidity among Moderately and Extremely Preterm Infants. J Pediatr. 2018;192:53–59.e2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Audeh S, Smolkin T, Bental Y, Haramati Z, Blazer S, Litig E, et al. Does admission hypothermia predispose to intraventricular hemorrhage in very-low-birth-weight infants? Neonatology. 2011;100(4):373–9. https://doi.org/10.1159/000327370.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Sharma D, Murki S, Kulkarni D, Pawale D, Vardhelli V, Anne RP, et al. The impact of a quality improvement project to reduce admission hypothermia on mortality and morbidity in very low birth weight infants. Eur J Pediatr. 2020;179(12):1851–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-020-03711-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaf J, Mulrow C, Gotzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62(10):e1–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Ouzzani M, Hammady H, Fedorowicz Z, Elmagarmid A. Rayyan — a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Syst Rev. 2016;5:210. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. The Joanna Briggs Institute. Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewer’s Manual 2018 [Available from: https://wiki.joannabriggs.org/display/MANUAL/Joanna+Briggs+Institute+Reviewer%27s+Manual

  29. Borenstein M, Hedges LV, Higgins J, Rothstein HR. A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis. Res Synth Methods. 2010;1(2):97–111. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Begg CB, Mazumdar M. Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics. 1994;1:1088–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Duval S, Tweedie R. Trim and fl: a simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics. 2000;56(2):455–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0006-341X.2000.00455.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Ogunles TA, Ogunfowora OB, Adekanmbi FA, Fetuga BM, Olanrewaju DM. Point-of-admission hypothermia among high-risk Nigerian newborns. BMC Pediatr. 2008;8(1):40. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2431-8-40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Neonatal Data Collection Group. Outcome of Inborn Compared with Outborn Very Low Birth Weight Infants Admitted to Level 3 Malaysian Nurseries. Med J Malaysia. 1995;50:1.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Malaysian very low birth weight study group. A national study of risk factors associated with mortality in very low birthweight infants in the Malaysian neonatal intensive care units. J Faediatr Child Health. 1997;33(1):18–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1754.1997.tb00985.x.

  35. Demirel N, Bas AY, Zenciroglu A. Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia in Very Low Birth Weight Infants, Indian J Pediatr. 2009;76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12098%2D%2D009%2D%2D0110—5.

  36. Das A, Shukla S, Rahman N, Gunzler D, Aughali N. Clinical Indicators of Late - Onset Sepsis Workup in very Low -Birth-Weight Infants in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit. Am J Perinatol. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0036-1579648.

  37. Lyu Y, Shah PS, Ye XY, Warre R, Piedboeuf B, Deshpandey A, et al. Association between admission temperature and mortality and major morbidity in preterm infants born at fewer than 33 weeks’ gestation. JAMA Pediatr. 2015;169(4):e150277. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2015.0277.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Levi S, Taylor W. RN, Robinson LE, levy LI. Analysis of morbidity and outcomes of infants weighing less than 800 grams at birth. South Med J. 1984;77(8):8–986. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3156.2008.02113.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Sodemann M, Nielsen J, Veirum J, Jakobsen MS, Biai S, Aaby P. Hypothermia of newborns is associated with excess mortality in the first 2 months of life in Guinea-Bissau, West Africa. 2008;13(8):980–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3156.2008.02113.x.

  40. Beletew B, Mengesha A, Wudu M, Abate M. Prevalence of neonatal hypothermia and its associated factors in East Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pediatr. 2020;20(1):148. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-020-02024-w.

  41. Onalo R. Neonatal hypothermia in sub-Saharan Africa: a review. Niger J Clin Pract. 2013;16(2):129–38. https://doi.org/10.4103/1119-3077.110120.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Trevisanuto D, Testoni D, de Almeida MFB. Maintaining normothermia: why and how? Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018;23(5):333–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.siny.2018.03.009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Simiyu DE. Morbidity and mortality of low birth weight infants in the new born unit of Kenyatta national hospital, Nairobi. East Afr Med J. 2004;81(7):367–74. https://doi.org/10.4314/eamj.v81i7.9193.

  44. Yu VY, Downe L, Astbury J, et al. Perinatal factors and adverse outcome in extremely low birthweight infants. Arch Dis Child. 1986;61:554–8. https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.61.6.554.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Jolly H, Molyneux P, Newell DJ. A controlled study of the effect on premature babies of temperature. J Pediatr. 1962;60(6):889–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3476(62)80174-7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Dr. Abeer Mohamed is greatly acknowledged for her help in proofreading the manuscript.

Funding

No fund.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Medicine, University of Khartoum, Alqasr Avenue, P.O. Box 102, Khartoum, Sudan

    Sagad Omer Obeid Mohamed, Sara Mohamed Ibrahim Ahmed, Reem Jamal Yousif Khidir, Mutaz Tarig Hassan Ahmed Shaheen, Mosab Hussen Mostafa Adam, Basil Abubakr Yagoub Ibrahim, Esra Osama Abdelrahman Elmahdi & Abubaker Shadoul Mohamed Farah

Authors
  1. Sagad Omer Obeid Mohamed
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sara Mohamed Ibrahim Ahmed
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Reem Jamal Yousif Khidir
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Mutaz Tarig Hassan Ahmed Shaheen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Mosab Hussen Mostafa Adam
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Basil Abubakr Yagoub Ibrahim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Esra Osama Abdelrahman Elmahdi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Abubaker Shadoul Mohamed Farah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

(SM) undertook research design and analysis; (SA, RK, MS, and MA) participated in searching databases; (SM, BI, EE, and AF) undertook articles screening and data extraction. All authors interpreted the results and drafted the manuscript. All authors revised and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sagad Omer Obeid Mohamed.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mohamed, S.O.O., Ahmed, S.M.I., Khidir, R.J.Y. et al. Outcomes of neonatal hypothermia among very low birth weight infants: a Meta-analysis. matern health, neonatol and perinatol 7, 14 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40748-021-00134-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40748-021-00134-6

Keywords

  • Hypothermia
  • Very low birth weight
  • Meta-analysis

Maternal Health, Neonatology and Perinatology

ISSN: 2054-958X

Contact us