Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of LED phototherapy patients

From: Risk factors for acute bilirubin encephalopathy on admission to two Myanmar national paediatric hospitals

 

Hospital A

Hospital B

n = 251

n = 339

Percentage male: n (%)a

142 (56.6 %)

195 (58.9 %)

Place of birth: n (%)

  

 Home: n (%)

78 (31.1 %)

88 (26.0 %)

 Hospital/Clinic: n (%)

160 (63.7 %)

237 (69.9 %)

 Other/Not stated: n (%)

13 (5.2 %)

14 (4.1 %)

Source of referral: n (%)

  

 Home: n (%)

54 (21.5 %)

90 (26.6 %)

 Hospital: n (%)

40 (15.9 %)

212 (62.5 %)

 Clinic: n (%)

103 (41.0 %)

12 (3.5 %)

 Other/Not stated: n (%)

54 (21.5 %)

25 (7.4 %)

Phototherapy elsewhere, prior to admission: n (%)

28 (11.2 %)

34 (11.0 %)

Admission weight (g)c: Median (IQR)

2,800 (2,400-3,200)

2,600 (1,940-3,040)

  < 1,000 g: n (%)

2 (0.8 %)

2 (0.6 %)

 1,000-1,499 g: n (%)

5 (2.0 %)

29 (8.8 %)

 1,500-2,499 g: n (%)

61 (24.5 %)

107 (32.5 %)

 2,500 g +: n (%)

181 (72.7 %)

191 (58.1 %)

ABEd noted at admission

  

 No: n (%)

219 (87.3 %)

267 (78.8 %)

 Yes: n (%)

32 (12.7 %)

72 (21.2 %)

  1. n number, IQR Interquartile range (25th percentile – 75th percentile)
  2. aGender missing for 8 records at Hospital B
  3. bPhototherapy elsewhere, prior to admission missing for 31 records at Hospital B
  4. cAdmission weight missing for two records at Hospital A, and 10 records at Hospital B
  5. dThe term ‘kernicterus’ is routinely used in both hospitals – this has been re-classified as ABE