Skip to main content
Download PDF

The fundamentals of a parental peer-to-peer support program in the NICU: a scoping review

Maternal Health, Neonatology and Perinatology volume 10, Article number: 19 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Purpose and background

Parental peer support is part of the Family Integrated Care model in NICUs. However, little attention has been devoted to the specific content and organization of parental peer support programs. This scoping review aimed to identify (1) the preferred content of a parental peer support intervention, (2) the organizational processes, and (3) the suggested educational curriculum for peer support providers within existing programs in neonatal care.

Discussion

Parental peer support programs have the goal to provide emotional support, information and assistance, and are to empower parents in the NICU. To achieve these goals, veteran parents receive training in communication skills, roles and boundaries, mental health, (non)medical aspects in the NICU and post-discharge preparation. Data on the organizational components remain limited. Hence, the question remains how the organization of a parental peer support program, and the training and supervision of veteran parents should be managed.

Implications for research and practice

This scoping review provides a variety of aspects that should be considered when developing and implementing a parental peer support program in the NICU. Program development preferably involves NICU staff at an early stage. Future research should focus on the support of diverse populations in terms of culture, social economic status and gender, and on the effects of parental peer support on parent and infant.

Introduction

In the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU), parents are faced with stressors which can affect their mental health, resulting in anxiety, isolation, (postpartum) depression, and post-traumatic stress disorder [1,2,3,4,5]. These mental health issues can interfere with the parents’ ability to parent their infant [6] and may also lead to negative neurodevelopmental outcomes of infants [7,8,9]. To support parents in developing their parenting skills, and to guide them in their coping mechanisms and emotional processes, various care models have already been applied in NICUs [10]. One of the care models is Family Integrated Care (FICare) [11]. FICare is one approach to care wherein parents are considered as members of the care team and are actively included in the (daily) care of their infant [11, 12]. Several studies have revealed that FICare is associated with improved infant health outcomes, decreased parental stress and increased parental involvement [12,13,14,15]. Comparable to other family-centred care approaches, FICare encourages the provision of psychosocial support as part of standard care. Psychosocial support is formally provided by nurses, physicians, mental health- and social care professionals and can be supplemented by parental peer support.

Peer-to-peer support (‘peer support’) is a well-established intervention with the purpose of providing emotional and social support to people with various health conditions [16]. According to qualitative evidence, parental peer support can be beneficial in helping parents cope with their situation because of the mutual experience the peers share [17,18,19]. Interaction with someone who shares the same experience - a peer supporter - may foster a better understanding of the situation and may provide more perspective for the future [17,18,19].

In previous studies, parental peer support in a NICU setting was provided through support groups or one-on-one approaches (buddy support systems) [17, 20,21,22,23]. Peer support interventions that have been reported in the past lack a thorough description of the content of the actual peer support, information about veteran parents (‘the peer supporter’) and the organization of the program. Authors do report some of these aspects but there is still a paucity of knowledge regarding the topics of conversation during peer support sessions and which design(s) of peer support provision is considered most desirable and effective for NICU parents. Questions remain about how a parental peer support program can be organized in terms of coordination of staff and veteran parents, the promotion of the program, the referral of NICU parents to the intervention, the duration and frequency of peer support provision, and how the program can be sustainably embedded in neonatal care. In a systematic review on the effects of peer support on users and those involved in the implementation, the authors note the lack of knowledge regarding the implementation of peer support in NICU settings [19]. Finally, gaps exist in the recruitment process of eligible peer supporters, and their training and supervision.

In order to provide evidence-informed guidance on how to develop a peer-support program for NICU families, this scoping review aims to identify (1) the preferred content of a parental peer support intervention, (2) the organizational processes, and (3) the suggested educational curriculum for peer support providers within existing programs in neonatal care.

Methods

Study approach

A scoping review was conducted in accordance with the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology of scoping reviews, based on the framework of Arksey and O’Malley [24]. Scoping reviews are suitable for systematically exploring the types of available evidence on a broad topic to identify the extent of research activity and research gaps, and to summarize research findings [24]. The publication was guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR) [25]. The review methodology was chosen because of the broad research question and the expectation that the literature on parental peer support programs would be heterogeneous.

Eligibility criteria

The following eligibility criteria were applied during the screening process: (1) Studies describing a parental peer support program, (2) Parental peer support should be given in a clinical setting, (3) Peer support is focused on parents of children aged 0–24 months and (4) Quantitative and qualitative studies, perspective papers and grey literature. We imposed no limitations on date of publication or language.

Information sources and search strategy

An information specialist (ND) of Amsterdam University Medical Center developed and executed the search in consultation with the research team in December 2022, with an update in April 2024. The search was based on a previous systematic review of the experiences and effects of parental peer support by Hunt et al. [19]. The bibliographic databases MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), Cochrane, Web of Science, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and Scopus were examined for articles published until April 2024. References were deduplicated with DedupEndNote Version 1.0.0. Additional papers were identified by using the reference lists of literature reviews that passed the relevance screening. New and relevant titles found in these reference lists were then assessed for eligibility.

Selection of sources of evidence

Duplicate publications in the databases were removed electronically prior to the screening process. Titles and abstracts were independently screened for eligibility by two reviewers (JMW and JMM). The full-text articles of the eligible publications were retrieved. Full-text articles were also retrieved for titles, for which the abstract provided insufficient information to assess inclusion. The same reviewers screened the full-text publications of the selected records independently. During the screening of the full-text publications, the definition of a peer supporter in the NICU as defined by Thomson & Balaam was found [26]. The full-text screening was repeated with this definition as a new selection criterion to narrow down the search results to NICU-specific papers. Discrepancies during the selection process were discussed by three reviewers (JMW, JMM and AP); a fourth researcher (KR) was available to solve persistent disagreements.

Data charting and data items

Data from the included papers were extracted using a self-constructed data charting form. The data charting form consisted of the key characteristics of the included papers and findings based on our review question: the content of the parental peer support intervention, the content of the training of veteran parents and, the organizational processes within the parental peer support programs. The form was piloted on five papers and slightly modified. Data were extracted by one reviewer (AP) and reviewed by JMW, JMM or KR. Discrepancies between the collected data were resolved through discussion with all reviewers.

Synthesis of results

We applied manifest content analysis [27] since this scoping review aimed to identify key elements of a parental peer support program without intending to find underlying meanings. One reviewer (AP) performed the coding and the categorization of the codes within each pre-defined concept. Three reviewers (JMW, JMM, KR) reviewed the codes and categories, and modifications were made till consensus was reached.

Results

Selection, characteristics and results of sources of evidence

The search yielded 31,802 publications. A total of 20,249 publications remained after removing duplications and were screened based on title and abstract. After this initial screening, the full-text publications of 142 titles were sought for retrieval. Ten publications were not available full-text. The remaining 132 papers were assessed for eligibility, which led to the exclusion of 109 papers. References of the included publications were hand-searched resulting in one additional article. The screening process was finalized with 24 publications eligible for this scoping review. An overview of the screening process is presented in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

PRISMA flow diagram of included studies

Full size image

Table 1 provides an overview of the general characteristics of the included publications. The papers originated from Northern America (n = 16) [17, 20, 21, 28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40], Europe (n = 5) [26, 41,42,43,44], Iran (n = 2) [22, 45] and Indonesia (n = 1) [23]. Fifteen papers consisted of scientific studies, of which eight had a quantitative design [21,22,23, 35, 36, 42, 43, 45], three had a qualitative design [17, 33, 41], and four employed mixed methods [20, 26, 31, 44]. Nine publications were program descriptions [27,28,29, 31, 33, 36,37,38,39]. Seven papers were centred around breastfeeding (n = 7) [23, 29, 33, 35, 41,42,43] and one program was focused on kangaroo mother care (n = 1) [23]. The target population of the programs consisted of mothers (n = 11) [17, 21,22,23, 29, 33, 35, 41,42,43, 45] and parents (n = 13) [20, 26, 28, 30,31,32, 34, 36,37,38,39,40, 44]. Some programs had additional target populations such as veteran parents [28, 30, 32], expecting mothers or parents [34, 38, 39], and family members and health care professionals [26, 44]. The parental peer support interventions were provided one-on-one (n = 7) [17, 23, 33, 35, 37, 42, 45], in a group (n = 6) [20, 22, 31, 36, 41, 42] or a combination of one-on-one and group-based interventions (n = 11) [21, 26, 28,29,30, 32, 34, 38,39,40, 44]. The settings included NICUs [17, 20, 31,32,33, 35,36,37, 40, 43, 45], NICUs combined with antenatal and/or post-discharge care [26, 29, 30, 34, 38,39,40,41,42, 44], a high-risk nursery [28], neonatal ward [22], and one undefined clinical setting wherein preterm infants were admitted [23].

Table 1 Descriptive characteristics of the included studies
Full size table

Synthesis of results

The content of the programs

Five program goals were identified when studying the content of the parental peer support programs: emotional support, education, parental empowerment, assistance in daily life, and referral to community resources. An overview of the goals and content of parental peer support programs can be found in Tables 2 and 3.

Table 2 Content and organization of one-on-one peer support interventions
Full size table
Table 3 Content and organization of group-based peer support interventions
Full size table

Emotional support

Emotional support as part of a parental peer support program was reported in 23 publications [17, 20, 21, 23, 26, 28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45]. According to several of these publications, emotional support can be provided by sharing personal stories [23, 28, 29, 32, 33, 43], actively listening to parents’ experiences [26, 43], and supporting parents in coping with concerns and emotions in a non-judgmental manner [20, 30,31,32, 36, 37, 43]. None of the publications mentioned a pre-defined manual regarding the provision of emotional support.

Education

Education as part of a parental peer support program was described in 22 publications [17, 20,21,22,23, 28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43, 45]. The goal of providing education was achieved by equipping parents with knowledge about the (non)medical aspects in the NICU and practical skills to take care of their infant. Nonmedical information contained information about the NICU environment, procedures and roles of staff members [20, 30,31,32, 34, 36]. Medical information consisted of information about the infants’ health and care, and the differences between a preterm and an infant born at term [22, 23, 28, 29, 33, 35,36,37, 43, 45]. Information on the anatomy and physiology of breastfeeding [22, 29, 33, 43] and kangaroo care [23] were reported in papers wherein the parental peer support was focused on these aspects. Practical skills referred to skills in caring for a preterm infant [45] and specific lactation skills [29, 35].

Parental empowerment

Nine studies reported on parental empowerment, referring to improving parents’ confidence and self-efficacy [22, 23, 26, 29, 30, 36,37,38,39]. This was done by encouraging parents to participate in the care of their infant(s) [23, 26, 36,37,38,39, 44]. In addition, veteran parents can encourage NICU parents to talk with staff about their infants’ condition [30], explain the aspects of being a NICU parent [20, 30, 31, 37], and support NICU parents in decision making [33].

Assistance in daily life and referral to community resources

Five publications described different types of assistance, e.g. financial, technical, or logistical assistance [26, 28, 30, 35, 38]. This may include assistance in arranging household tasks, childcare for parents’ older children, or transportation to the hospital [26]. Furthermore, veteran parents may inform NICU parents about how to find and when to utilize community resources [26, 32, 36, 37, 40].

Organizational processes

One-on-one programs

Eighteen publications reported on organizational processes of one-on-one parental peer support programs [17, 21, 23, 26, 28,29,30, 32,33,34,35, 37,38,39,40, 43,44,45]. The following aspects were described: the matching and referral process, and the timeframe wherein the parental peer support was provided (see Table 2).

Referral and matching to veteran parents

The process of referral and matching in 12 programs was described in 14 publications [17, 21, 26, 28,29,30, 32, 37,38,39,40, 43,44,45]. The parental peer support programs were introduced to parents upon admission or within the first week of admission through verbal or written invitations [21, 28, 30, 37, 39, 40]. Parents were preferably matched with veteran parents with a similar background. The matching process was reported to be based on comparable infant characteristics (gestational age, birthweight, and diagnosis), family characteristics, linguistic and cultural background, and geographic proximity [17, 21, 26, 28, 30, 32, 37,38,39,40, 43, 44]. Parents were referred to a veteran parent after their own request in nine programs [21, 28, 30, 32, 34, 37,38,39, 44]. Three papers reported that referral can be effectuated by healthcare professionals [29, 32, 44] and in two papers, a veteran parent visited all parents as part of standard care [17, 43].

Timeframe

In 11 publications timeframes were reported, i.e., the starting point of the parental peer support, the frequency of the meetings, and the end of the program [17, 26, 28,29,30, 32, 37,38,39,40, 44]. A wide variety of these aspects were found. The one-on-one sessions started soon after birth in several programs, with only three papers specifying ‘soon after birth’ to be immediately after admission or within 24 h after birth [28,29,30]. In one paper, the intervention could be started during the antenatal period [26]. The frequency of the meetings varied from a minimum of one session per week [37, 43], to twice a month after discharge [37]. Two papers reported that the number of individual sessions depended on the parents’ wishes [37, 40]. The papers showed a variation regarding the end of the parental peer support intervention, ranging from three months [26] to two years [65] or as long as needed [26, 32, 40].

Other forms of individual parental peer support

Two papers described other forms of individual parental peer support: the ‘Visiting parents’ and the ‘Natural parents connection’ [30, 40]. The ‘Visiting parents’ is a concept wherein veteran parents visit the NICU regularly to talk with parents [30, 40]. The ‘Natural parents connection’ refers to the (spontaneous) contact between current NICU parents in common meeting areas such as family lounges [40].

Group-based support

Sixteen publications report on organizational processes of group-based parental peer support programs [20,21,22, 26, 28,29,30,31,32, 34, 36, 38, 40,41,42, 44]. The following two aspects were described: the group composition, and the duration and frequency of the meetings.

Group composition

In contrast to the one-on-one support sessions, peer support in groups can be provided by the veteran parents but also by the NICU parents. One study also provided parental peer support meetings to expecting parents in the antenatal ward [34]. All group-based programs were held live in the hospital except for one. This program, described in two papers, utilized an online platform (Facebook) to provide breastfeeding-related parental peer support [41, 42]. Veteran parents moderated the meetings in four programs [20, 22, 31, 36]. Eight authors reported that healthcare staff could be involved as moderators to provide education or assistance [28, 30, 32, 34, 36, 40,41,42]. Two publications report explicitly that healthcare professionals were not involved in the meetings [22, 31].

Duration and frequency of the meetings

The starting point of the first group meeting was mentioned in four papers [22, 32, 41, 42]. One study specifically reported that parents were invited to join the meetings in the first week postpartum [22]. The online group was accessible after invitation and allocation to the group [41, 42], and one group-based parental peer support program was accessible when the veteran parent started volunteering [32].

In general, the group meetings lasted one to two hours. Some authors specified the time of day, varying from meetings during daytime, evenings, and weekends [21, 30, 31, 33]. It was not described when access to the group ended, except for one study where the authors indicated that parents could join the meetings as long as they wanted, depending on their needs [35]. Eight of the sixteen group-based programs reported on frequencies, varying from weekly [20, 29,30,31, 36] to monthly [28] meetings. The group meetings were promoted through personal invitations and leaflets in public areas [26, 30, 32, 34, 35, 41].

Veteran parents

Twenty-three of the 24 publications reported on veteran parents. Two main aspects were identified: recruitment and selection, and training and supervision (see Table 4).

Table 4 Training of veteran parents
Full size table

Recruitment and selection

Veteran parents suitable for volunteering were recommended or directly invited by NICU staff [17, 28,29,30, 36, 37, 39, 40, 45], other volunteer veteran parents [40] or peer support services [20, 31, 41]. Two authors reported the option to recruit new volunteers during patient reunions of the ward [32, 39]. Seven authors reported a minimal period after discharge from the NICU before contacting potential volunteers, ranging from three months [30] up to six years [17, 26, 30, 32, 36, 37, 40]. In four of these seven papers, veteran parents were able to volunteer after one year post-discharge [17, 32, 37, 40]. In one parental peer support program from the same authors [20, 31], veteran parents were selected only after they had engaged in simpler volunteer tasks for at least one year. An assessment was part of the selection process in several programs [21,22,23, 26, 32, 37, 39, 40, 44]. Three programs enforced criteria to exclude veteran parents from volunteering, such as concerns regarding child abuse or neglect, untreated or complex psychosocial problems, underlying illnesses of the infant and bereavement [32, 40, 45].

Training and supervision

In total, 15 publications reported on the training of veteran parents prior to their contact with NICU families [17, 21, 26, 29, 32, 35, 37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45], and nine publications reported on the supervision of veteran parents [26, 28,29,30, 32, 33, 37, 40, 43]. The main topics within the training sessions were: sharing own experiences [26, 32, 39, 43], communication skills [17, 21, 26, 37,38,39,40,41,42, 44], roles and boundaries [21, 26], parenting in the NICU [26, 37, 39, 45], lactation [29, 33, 35, 43], the NICU life and environment [37, 39, 40], medical information [26, 37, 39, 40, 44, 45], mental health aspects in the NICU [26, 37, 39], diversity in parent population [39, 40], post-discharge [37, 39, 45], and standard hospital training and program procedures [26, 37, 40]. Table 5 provides more details on these topics.

Table 5 Training topics prior to providing peer support
Full size table

The duration of the volunteer training ranged from 30 min to 80 h divided over multiple days [26, 44]. One program specifically provided a one-day training [17], whereas multiple training days were reported in nine papers [22, 26, 29, 32, 37, 39, 40, 44, 45]. Three programs reported volunteer training but did not specify the frequency of the training sessions [21, 23, 43].

Supervising a veteran parent as a volunteer was part of ten parental peer support programs [17, 26, 28,29,30, 32, 33, 37, 40, 44]. This supervision could be provided individually [17, 29, 40], in a group [29, 30], or a combination of both [26, 37, 43, 44]. Supervision was provided to create the opportunity to share and reflect on experiences [26, 28, 29, 44], provide emotional support and counselling [26, 40, 44], provide feedback and appreciation to the veteran parents [26, 37, 40, 44], and for educational purposes [29, 30, 37]. The reported frequency of the supervisory meetings varied from daily supervision [26] to weekly [29], monthly [28, 29] and annual sessions [40].

Discussion

This scoping review aimed to identify and provide an overview of the following aspects of parental peer support programs in a NICU setting: (1) the preferred content of the intervention, (2) the organizational processes, and (3) the suggested educational curriculum for peer support providers. Findings of 24 papers showed that the content of parental peer support programs mainly consists of providing emotional support, education, parental empowerment, assistance in daily life, and referral to other resources. Data on the organizational processes of both one-on-one as well as group-based programs showed to be limited and heterogeneous. The training programs for veteran parents consisted of the sharing of own experiences, communication skills, roles and boundaries, parenting in the NICU, the NICU life and environment, medical information, mental health aspects in the NICU, diversity, post-discharge information and standard hospital training and program procedures. A broad variety was found in duration and frequency of the training, and the facilitation of supervisory sessions.

The content of the peer support interventions is comparable to some peer support programs in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU). In one study, a program evaluation was conducted wherein they asked families about their perspectives on a one-on-one Peer Mentor program [46]. Families reported to be interested in experiences of the peer mentor regarding the treatment of the child, coping strategies, involvement in the care team and how to balance life in the PICU [46]. In another study, a one-on-one approach was used with the goal of providing emotional support, information and, support in communication with staff and decision making [47]. Furthermore, as part of the program, a handbook for PICU parents was written, containing medical information and procedures within the PICU, and how parents can seek support [47].

The limited results on the organization of the program and the training of veteran parents, align with the findings of a systematic review conducted by Hunt et al. [19]. Their review focused on the experiences and effects of parental peer support on people delivering and receiving, and those involved in the implementation. Our review complements their findings in terms of the content and organization of the peer support interventions, and the content of the training of veteran parents. Challenges in organizing and operationalizing a parental peer support program have been acknowledged by other authors [31, 48, 49]. We suggest that future research should give attention to the organization and sustainable implementation of a parental peer support program. We also recommend to further evaluate the effects of parental peer support programs on both parent and infant. Outcome measures should include the parental self-efficacy, satisfaction, psychological outcomes, the parent-infant bond, infant neurobehavioral development and Length of stay (LOS).

The parental peer support programs included in this review were aimed at parents of which 11 specifically targeted mothers. This special interest in mothers can be explained by the fact that six programs were related to breastfeeding. Nevertheless, it remains surprising that we did not find a program explicitly aimed at fathers. This is interesting since there is a growing body of evidence suggesting the differences in experiences [50] and outcomes [51] between mothers and fathers after a NICU period. In addition, interventions such as professional-led father support groups in the NICU have been studied and implemented in the past [52,53,54]. Although these support groups were led by healthcare staff such as a psychologist, neonatologist or hospital chaplain instead of veteran fathers, qualitative evidence shows the therapeutic benefits of parental peer support groups on fathers [52, 53]. Moreover, the presence of former NICU fathers was noted to be beneficial for the group sessions in one paper [55]. Therefore, further studies on the use and effects of peer-to-peer support on fathers, which involves veteran fathers, is recommended.

Twelve included papers described the matching process in one-on-one programs between veteran parents and NICU parents. In six programs this matching process was based on, but not limited to, similarities in culture, language, education and socioeconomic status (SES). Although it seems sensible that programs consider these aspects, there is only limited evidence available on what the impact of parental peer support is among parents of minorities and those with a lower SES. Reaching out to marginalized groups can be challenging which is illustrated by some authors who have reported that parental peer support interventions are mainly sought for and attended by white, and middle- and high-income families [56,57,58]. Two included studies describing one program have examined the effects of one-on-one peer support on mothers of very preterm infants in Canada [17, 21]. Acknowledging the methodological weaknesses, these studies suggested that one-on-one parental peer support was effective for mothers with a lower SES, from diverse cultural backgrounds, and non-English speaking [17, 21]. Tailoring the needs of culturally diverse and socially disadvantaged families, should be taken into account when studying and implementing parental peer support interventions to comply with culturally competent care.

Another issue that may deserve attention when implementing a parental peer support interventions is establishing a solid support base among NICU staff. None of the included papers reported how the parental peer support program was introduced to the NICU, and only one study reported staff responses to the integration of veteran parents within the units [26]. This study noted that staff’s lack of trust in veteran parents was a serious concern, leading to staff members refusing them access to information about NICU families [26]. This mistrust was also reported by peer support providers in other healthcare contexts wherein staff members had concerns about the peer support providers’ roles, skills and boundaries [59, 60]. Although the mistrust in veteran parents by staff was only reported in one study, several papers on implementing FICare in neonatal units have shown that an attitude change in the workplace is required for interventions to succeed [61, 62]. Hence, staff engagement should be part of further research regarding the development and implementation of parental peer support programs. Subsequently, frontline staff should be informed and educated about the peer support programs and peer support providers prior to implementation.

Although literature summaries on parental peer support in the NICU have been published [48, 49], this scoping review was the first to identify the various elements of a parental peer support program systematically. Nevertheless, some limitations should be considered. First, we did not perform a quality assessment of the included studies. This seemed appropriate as we did not aim to systematically review the efficacy of peer support programs on prespecified (infant and parent) outcomes, but to provide an overview of the elements of a peer support program. Secondly, we limited our search to parental peer support programs in NICU settings. There is a possibility that NICU parents may be offered peer support after discharge to help them cope with their new outpatient situation. However, we believe that the results of this scoping review can be used for future programs wherein some of the summarized components may be directly adopted during the development stage of new programs. On the other hand, elements regarding the organizational processes that remain unclear due to limited or variation in data, can be addressed in future programs and studies.

Conclusion

This review summarized the content of both parental peer support programs as well as the content of the training programs of veteran parents who provide peer support. Furthermore, the aspects of organizing a parental peer support program have been identified. We conclude that parental peer support programs have the goal to provide emotional support, information and assistance, and is also an intervention to empower parents in the NICU. To achieve these goals, veteran parents receive training in communication skills, roles and boundaries, mental health, (non)medical aspects in the NICU and post-discharge preparation. Data on the organizational components remain limited. Hence, there is no ‘one size fits all’ answer to the question how the organization of a parental peer support program, and the training and supervision of veteran parents should be managed. Therefore, it is recommended that these aspects are addressed in future studies and programs.

Data availability

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

Abbreviations

NICU:

Neonatal Intensive Care Unit

FICare:

Family Integrated Care

JBI:

Joanna Briggs Institute

PICU:

Pediatric Intensive Care Unit

SES:

Social Economic Status

References

  1. Obeidat HM, Bond EA, Clark Callister L. The parental experience of having an infant in the newborn intensive care unit. J Perinat Educ. 2009;18:23–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Carter J, Mulder R, Bartram A, Darlow B. Infants in a neonatal intensive care unit: parental response. Archives Disease Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2005;90:109–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Gale G, Franck LS, Kools S, Lynch M. Parents’ perceptions of their infant’s pain experience in the NICU. Int J Nurs Stud. 2004;41:51–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lefkowitz DS, Baxt C, Evans JR. Prevalence and correlates of posttraumatic stress and postpartum depression in parents of infants in the neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU). J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2010;17:230–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Shaw RJ, Bernard RS, Deblois T, Ikuta LM, Ginzburg K, Koopman C. The relationship between acute stress disorder and posttraumatic stress disorder in the neonatal intensive care unit. Psychosomatics. 2009;50:131–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. De Falco S, Emer A, Martini L, Rigo P, Pruner S, Venuti P. Predictors of mother–child interaction quality and child attachment security in at-risk families. Front Psychol. 2024;5:898.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Turpin H, Urben S, Ansermet F, Borghini A, Murray MM, Müller-Nix C. The interplay between prematurity, maternal stress and children’s intelligence quotient at age 11: a longitudinal study. Sci Rep. 2019;9:450.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. McManus BM, Poehlmann J. Maternal depression and perceived social support as predictors of cognitive function trajectories during the first 3 years of life for preterm infants in Wisconsin. Child Care Health Dev. 2012;38:425–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bozkurt O, Eras Z, Sari FN, Dizdar EA, Uras N, Canpolat FE, Oguz SS. Does maternal psychological distress affect neurodevelopmental outcomes of preterm infants at a gestational age of ≤ 32weeks. Early Hum Dev. 2017;104:27–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Franck LS, O’Brien. The evolution of family-centered care: from supporting parent-delivered interventions to a model of family integrated care. Birth Defects Res. 2019;15:1044–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. http://familyintegratedcare.com/ (Accessed on. November 2023).

  12. O’Brien K, Robson K, Bracht M, Cruz M, Lui K, Alvaro R, da Silva O, Monterrosa L, Narvey M, Ng E, Soraisham A, Ye XY, Mirea L, Tarnow-Mordi W, Lee SK. Effectiveness of family integrated care in neonatal intensive care units on infant and parent outcomes: a multicentre, multinational, cluster-randomised controlled trial. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2018;2:245–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. van Veenendaal NR, van der Schoor SRD, Broekman BFP, Groof de F, van Laerhoven H, van den Heuvel MEN, Rijnhart JJM, van Goudoever JHB, van Kempen AAMW. Association of a family integrated care model with paternal mental health outcomes during neonatal hospitalization. JAMA Netw Open. 2022;5:e2144720.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. O’Brien K, Bracht M, Robson K, Ye XY, Mirea L, Cruz M, Ng E, Monterrosa L, Soraisham A, Alvaro R, Narvey M, da Silva O, Lui K, Tarnow-Mordi W, Lee SK. Evaluation of the family integrated care model of neonatal intensive care: a cluster randomized controlled trial in Canada and Australia. BMC Pediatr. 2015;15:210.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Ansari NS, Franck LS, Tomlinson C, Colucci A, O’Brien. A pilot study of Family-Integrated Care (FICare) in critically ill preterm and term infants in the NICU: FICare Plus. Children. 2023;10:1337.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Campbell J. Sociology & Education. Essex, United Kingdom; ED-Tech Press:2019.

  17. Ardal F, Sulman J, Fuller-Thomson E. Support like a walking stick: parent-buddy matching for language and culture in the NICU. Neonatal Netw. 2011;20:89–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Haldar S, Mishra SR, Khelifi M, Pollack AH, Pratt W. Opportunities and design considerations for peer support in a hospital setting. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 2017:867–879.

  19. Hunt A. Boddy,Whear, Wakely, Bethel, Morris, Prosser, Collinson, Kurinczuk, Thompson-Coon. They’ve walked the walk: A systematic review of quantitative and qualitative evidence for parent-to-parent support for parents of babies in neonatal care. Journal of Neonatal Nursing. 2019;25:166–176.

  20. Dahan S, Bourque CJ, Reichherzer M, Prince J, Mantha G, Savaria M, Janvier A. Peer support groups for families in Neonatology: why and how to get started? Acta Paediatr. 2020;109:2525–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Preyde M, Ardal F. Effectiveness of a parent buddy program for mothers of very preterm infants in a neonatal intensive care unit. Can Med Assoc J. 2003;168:969–73.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Rezapour S, Aziznejadroshan P, Ahmadpour-Kacho M, Zabihi A, Tilaki KH, Zahedpasha Y. Impact of peer education on breastfeeding self-efficacy among primiparous women with hospitalized neonate in neonatal ward of amirkola children’s hospital, Mazandaran Province, Iran. Iran J Neonatology. 2021;12:79–85.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kurniawati, Rustina Y, Budiati T. Peer support increases maternal confidence, Kangaroo Mother Care implementation and weight gain in LBW infants. Compr Child Adolesc Nurs. 2019;42:252–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Arksey H, O’Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2005;8:19–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O’Brien KK, Colquhoun H, Levac D, Moher D, Peters MD, Horsley T, Weeks L, Hempel S, et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169:467–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Thomson G, Balaam MC. International insights into peer support in a neonatal context: a mixed-methods study. PLoS ONE. 2019;14:e0219743.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Kondracki NL, Wellman NS, Amundson DR. Content analysis: review of methods and their applications in nutrition education. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2002;34:224–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Mangurten MH, Slade C, Fitzsimons D. Parent-parent support in the care of high-risk newborns. JOGN Nurs. 1979;8:257–77.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Meier PP, Engstrom JL, Rossman B. Breastfeeding peer counselors as direct lactation care providers in the neonatal intensive care unit. J Hum Lactation. 2013;29:313–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Garrand S, Sherman N, Rentchler D, Jung AL. A parent-to-parent program. Fam Community Health. 1978;1:103–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Dahan S, Bourque CJ, Reichherzer M, Prince J, Mantha G, Savaria M, Janvier A. Community, hope, and resilience: parental perspectives on peer support in neonatology. J Pediatr. 2022;243:85–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Smith AV. Parent outreach in a neonatal intensive care nursery. Soc Work. 1986;31:69–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Rossman B, Engstrom JL, Meier PP, Vonderheid SC, Norr KF, Hill PD. They’ve walked in my shoes: mothers of very low birth weight infants and their experiences with breastfeeding peer counselors in the neonatal intensive care unit. J Hum Lactation. 2011;27:14–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Voos KC, Miller L, Park N, Olsen S. Promoting family-centered care in the NICU through a parent-to-parent manager position. Adv Neonatal Care. 2015;15:119–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Oza-Frank R, Bhatia A, Smith C. Impact of peer counselors on breastfeeding outcomes in a non-delivery NICU setting. Adv Neonatal care. 2014;14:e1–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Minde K, Shosenberg N, Marton P, Thompson J, Ripley J, Burns S. Self-help groups in a premature nursery-a controlled evaluation. J Pediatr. 1980;96:933–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Lindsay JK, Roman L, DeWys M, Eager M, Levick J, Quinn M. Creative caring in the NICU: parent-to-parent support. Neonatal Netw. 1993;12:37–44.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Jarrett MH. Parent partners: a parent-to-parent support program in the NICU. Part I: program development. Pediatr Nurs. 1996;22:60–3.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Jarrett MH. Parent partners: a parent-to-parent support program in the NICU. Part II: program implementation. Pediatr Nurs. 1996;22:142–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Levick J, Quinn M, Vennema C. NICU parent-to-parent partnerships: a comprehensive approach. Neonatal Netw. 2014;33:66–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Niela-Vilen H, Axelin A, Melender H-L, Salantera S. Aiming to be a breastfeeding mother in a neonatal intensive care unit and at home: a thematic analysis of peer-support group discussion in social media. Matern Child Nutr. 2014;11:712–26.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Niela-Vilen H, Axelin A, Melender H-L, Loyttyniemi E, Salantera S. Breastfeeding preterm infants - a randomized controlled trial of the effectiveness of an internet-based peer-support group. J Adv Nurs. 2016;72:2496–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Laborie S, Denis A, Horsch A, Occelli P, Margier J, Harari MM, Claris O, Touzet S, Fumeaux CJF. Breastfeeding peer counselling for mothers of preterm neonates: protocol of a stepped-wedge cluster randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2020;10:e032910.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Thomson G, Balaam MC. Sharing and modifying stories in neonatal peer support: an international mixed-methods study. Scand J Caring Sci. 2021;35:805–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Taheri M, Nikfarid L, Farahani AS, Shakeri N. The effect of a peer-group support intervention program on the tensions of mothers with premature neonates admitted to the intensive care units in Babol, Iran. Adv Nurs Midwifery. 2019;28:15–9.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Pereira N, MacDonald C, Drobot A, Bennett A, Ali A-B, Garros D. A peer and volunteer program for patients and their families in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit: a pilot program evaluation. Front Pead. 2021;9:e711083.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Michelson KN, Rychlik K, Fragen P, et al. Testing a program to support decision-making among parents of children in the PICU. Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI); 2020.

  48. Hall SL, Ryan DJ, Beatty J, Grubbs L. Recommendations for peer-to-peer support for NICU parents. J Perinatol. 2015;35:S9–13.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Bourque CL, Dahan S, MAntha G, Robson K, Reichherzer M, Janvier A. Improving neonatal care with the help of veteran resource parents: an overview of current practices. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018;23:44–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Jackson K, Ternestedt B-M, Schollin J. From alienation to familiarity: experiences of mothers and fathers of preterm infants. J Adv Nurs. 2003;43:120–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. McKeown L, Burke K, Cobham VE, Kimball H, Foxcroft K, Callaway L. The prevalence of PTSD of mothers and fathers of high-risk infants admitted to NICU: a systematic review. Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2023;26:33–49.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Scott Z, Archibald SJ. A service evaluation of the fathers’ peer support group on a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). J Neonatal Nurs. 2021;27:269–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Thomson-Salo F, Kuschel CA, Kamlin OF, Cuzzilla R. A fathers’ group in NICU: recognising and responding to paternal stress, utilising peer support. J Neonatal Nurs. 2017;23:294–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Archibald S-J. What about fathers? A review of a fathers’ peer support group on a neonatal Intensive Care Unit. J Neonatal Nurs. 2019;25:272–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Cray M, Embleton N. Fathers in the NICU: what type of support do they want? Infant. 2018;14:129–30.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Lægteskov TV, Holm KG, Petersen M, Lysdal RK, Hjelvang BR, Brødsgaard A. Father groups in the neonatal Intensive Care Unit. A supportive intervention. Adv Neonatal Care. 2023;23:478–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Roman LA, Lindsay JK, Boger RP, DeWys M, Beaumont EJ, Jones AS, Haas B. Parent-to-parent support initiated in the neonatal intensive care unit. Res Nurs Health. 1995;18:385–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Stauber SR, Mahan CK. Successes and struggles of parent support groups in neonatal intensive care units. J Perinatol. 1987;7:140–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Ehrlich C, Slattery M, Chester GVP, Crompton D. What happens when peer support workers are introduced as members of community-based clinical mental health service delivery teams: a qualitative study. J Interprof Care. 2020;34:107–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Tse S, Mak WWS, Lo IWK, Liu LL, Yuen WWY, Yau S, Ho K, Chan S-K, Wong S. A one-year longitudinal qualitative study of peer support services in a non-western context: the perspectives of peer support workers, service users, and co-workers. Psychiatry Res. 2017;255:27–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Patel N, Ballantyne A, Weightman J, Weightman SF. Integrated Care: changing the culture in the neonatal unit. Arch Dis Child. 2018;103:415–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. van Veenendaal NR, Labrie NHM, Mader S, van Kempen AAMW, van der Schoor SRD, van Goudoever JB, CROWN Study Group. An international study on implementation and facilitators and barriers for parent-infant closeness in neonatal units. Pediatr Invest. 2022;6:179–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Floortje Boer for her contribution to the preliminary search.

Funding

not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Neonatology, Emma Children’s Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, 1105 AZ, The Netherlands

    A. Pascual, J. M. Wielenga, K. Ruhe & A. H. van Kaam

  2. Medical Library, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    N. P. Denswil

  3. Department of Pediatrics, Amsterdam UMC, Emma Children’s Hospital, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    J. M. Maaskant

  4. Amsterdam Reproduction & Development Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    A. H. van Kaam

Authors
  1. A. Pascual
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. J. M. Wielenga
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. K. Ruhe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. A. H. van Kaam
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. N. P. Denswil
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. J. M. Maaskant
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualisation and design: AP, JMW, JMM. Developing search strategy: AP, JMW, JMM, NPD. Analysis: AP, JMW, JMM, KR. Writing - original draft: AP, KR, JMW, JMM. Writing - review & editing: AHK, NPD. All authors reviewed and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Pascual.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

not applicable.

Consent for publication

not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pascual, A., Wielenga, J.M., Ruhe, K. et al. The fundamentals of a parental peer-to-peer support program in the NICU: a scoping review. matern health, neonatol and perinatol 10, 19 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40748-024-00190-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40748-024-00190-8

Keywords

Maternal Health, Neonatology and Perinatology

ISSN: 2054-958X

Contact us