Skip to main content

Examination of risk factors for high Edinburgh postnatal depression scale scores: a retrospective study at a single university hospital in Japan

Abstract

Background

Perinatal mental health, such as postpartum depression, is an important issue that can threaten the lives of women and children. It is essential to understand the risk factors in advance and intervene before they can lead to postnatal depression. The risk factors of postpartum depression are reported to vary considerably in Japan. This study aimed to evaluate the risk factors for women with high Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) scores and to find women who may need our intervention to prevent postpartum depression.

Methods

This was a retrospective observational study conducted at a single center. At the one-month check-up after birth, the EPDS test was performed in 1625 women who gave birth at our hospital from 2008 to 2016. We evaluated maternal, birth, neonatal and social factors and the breastfeeding status from medical records. Thereafter, we examined the factors that contributed to a high EPDS score.

Results

There were 284 women in the high-score group with an EPDS of ≥ 9, and 1341 women in the low-score group with an EPDS score ≤ of 8. Maternal mental disorders and neonatal transport were significantly associated with high EPDS scores. Conversely, exclusive breastfeeding was significantly associated with the low-score EPDS group.

Conclusions

The principal factor for high EPDS scores was a mental disease. Based on this result, we suggest that early intervention in women at high risk for postpartum depression could prevent serious consequences such as abuse and suicide.

Background

Perinatal mental health, such as postpartum depression, is an important issue that can threaten the lives of women and children. In Japan, maternal suicide occurs more than twice as often as maternal death due to perinatal complications. Nearly half of the women who committed suicide experienced postpartum depression and other mental disorders [1]. Postpartum depression adversely affects “bonding,” i.e., a mother’s emotional attachment to a child [2, 3]. Women with postpartum depression are more likely to abuse their newborns through actions, such as neglect [4]. Postpartum depression, bonding disorders, and abuse negatively impact the development of the affected children [5, 6], and the adverse effects may be transmitted across generations [7, 8].

The incidence of postpartum depression increased in the country (from 5.0 to 26.32%), and the pooled prevalence was reported to be 14% [9]. Moreover, its prevalence in Japan is 14.3% [10]. A rapid decrease in estrogen and dysregulation of cortisol have been reported to be associated with postpartum depression, but the exact cause remains unknown [11,12,13,14]. Various risk factors for postpartum depression were reported, such as depression during pregnancy, being a single mother, young women, grand multipara, low income, low education levels, history of mental disorders, stressful life events (such as bereavement of a loved one, divorce, and unemployment), and lack of social support [15,16,17,18]. Japanese studies have also reported risk factors, such as primipara, young women, a perceived lack of family cohesion, lack of social support, current physical illness treatment, psychiatric illness treatment, negative feelings about pregnancy, and combined breast and bottle feeding [19, 20]. However, research on risk factors in Japan is limited to small-scale population-based studies, and the results exhibit significant variability. The interest in postpartum depression has been increasing in recent years, leading to various interventions for prevention. This has further complicated the assessment of risk factors. This means that by conducting more interventions for the high-risk group, there is a possibility that the true risk factors may not be accurately identified. Furthermore, there are not many studies that have evaluated the risk of postpartum depression based on the presence or absence of mental disorders or the details of these.

Our study aims to assess the risk factors in our hospital associated with high EPDS scores before intervention, with the goal of linking it to future activities for the prevention of postpartum depression. Additionally, we explored whether there are differences in risk factors based on the presence of mental disorders and their specifics.

Methods

Participants and collected data

This is a retrospective observational study conducted at a single center. We evaluated the data of women who gave birth at our hospital between 2008 and 2016 and who underwent the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) at the first-month of check-up after birth. During this period, we had not yet been able to conduct systematic interventions for the evaluation of risk factors and the prevention of postpartum depression based on them. In principle, all women completed the EPDS questionnaire unless they did not speak Japanese, were undergoing psychiatric treatment due to poor mental status, or were transferred. The EPDS scores at the first-month check-up after birth, maternal factors, birth factors, neonatal factors, breastfeeding status, and social factors were extracted from the medical records. Maternal factors included age at birth, parity, fetus number, pregnancy complication (e.g., hypertensive disorder of pregnancy, gestational diabetes mellitus), underlying maternal disease (e.g., autoimmune disease, heart disease), mental disorder, and maternal transport (i.e., the woman was transferred to our hospital from another hospital due to complications). Birth factors included gestational age at birth and birthing method. Neonatal factors included birth weight, Z-score of the birth weight, hospitalization at the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), and neonatal transport (i.e., the newborn was transported from our hospital to another hospital due to complications). Social factors included the presence of the partner, welfare, and late visit (i.e., the first visit was after 22 gestational weeks).

Risk assessment of high EPDS score

The cutoff value for EPDS was set at 8/9, as noted by Okano et al., who demonstrated its highest detection rate for postpartum depression in the Japanese version of EPDS (the sensitivity was 0.75 and the specificity was 0.95) [21]. Women were assigned to a high-score group with an EPDS of ≥ 9 and a low-score group with an EPDS of ≤ 8. The following items were compared between the groups: age at birth, number of young pregnant women (age at birth ≤ 19 years), advanced maternal age (age at birth ≥ 40 years), primipara, multiple pregnancy, pregnancy complications, underlying maternal disease, mental disorder, maternal transport, gestational age at birth, number of preterm birth, urgent caesarean section, birth weight, Z-score of birth weight, low birth weight (< 2500 g), light for date (birth weight < 10th percentile), hospitalization at the NICU, neonatal transport, exclusive breastfeeding, bottle-feeding, no partner, welfare, and late visit. Multivariate analysis was performed using items that revealed significant differences in the univariate analysis, and risk factors that resulted in high EPDS scores were extracted.

Risk assessment by presence or absence of mental disorders and its details

As a sub-analysis, women were divided into two groups according to the presence of mental disorders, and the backgrounds between the two groups were compared. Risk factors for high EPDS scores in both groups were determined by univariate and multivariate analysis, respectively. In addition, for the group with mental disorders, we investigated whether any factors resulted in a high EPDS score among the differences in disease classification by International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-10, medication, and disease condition. Disease classification by ICD-10 was as follows: F10 -F19, Mental and behavioral disorders due to psychoactive substance use; F20 -F29, Schizophrenia, schizotypal and delusional disorders; F30 -F39, Mood [affective] disorders; F40 -F48, Neurotic, stress-related and somatoform disorders; F50 -F59, Behavioral syndromes associated with physiological disturbances and physical factors; F60 -F69, Disorders of adult personality and behavior; F70 -F79, Mental retardation; F80 -F89, Disorders of psychological development; F90 -F98; Behavioral and emotional disorders with onset usually occurring in childhood and adolescence; F99 -F99, Unspecified mental disorder. Medications included the variables “none”, “single-agent”, “polypharmacy”, or “interruption during pregnancy”. Disease conditions included history only, onset during pregnancy, and postpartum exacerbations.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed as follows. Student’s t-test and chi-square test were used for univariate analysis. For multivariate analysis, binomial logistic regression analysis (forced entry method) was performed using SPSS version 23 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA). Differences were considered statistically significant at P < 0.05.

This study was approved by our ethics review board (29–196). All data were anonymized and participants were allowed to refuse participation by opting out.

Results

From 2008 to 2016, the total number of births at our hospital was 1861. The EPDS questionnaire was administered to 1625 women, and the implementation rate was 87%. 23% of women did not undergo the EPDS for reasons such as not speaking Japanese, having their one-month checkup at another clinic, or not participating due to poor mental health and already receiving psychiatric treatment. The characteristics of the women are presented in Table 1. Since our hospital is a university hospital with various medical departments, the proportion of pregnancy complications and underlying maternal disease was high. In addition, we have a psychiatric department, so the pregnancy rate with mental disorders was high (5.2%).

Table 1 Characteristics of the women

Risk assessment of high EPDS score

The median EPDS score was 4 (range: 0–28) point. The high-score group with an EPDS of ≥ 9 comprised 284 women, and the low score group with an EPDS of ≤ 8 comprised 1341 women. Table 2 summarizes the characteristics of both groups. Maternal age at birth, gestational age of birth, and birth weight did not differ between the two groups. The Z-score of birth weight was slightly lower in the high-score group. The rate of primipara, underlying maternal disease, mental disorder, light for date, neonatal transport, bottle-feeding, and late visit were higher in the high-score group than in the low-score group. The rate of maternal transport, preterm birth, and exclusive breastfeeding was significantly higher in the low-score group. Binary logistic regression analysis (forced entry method) was performed using items for which significant differences were found in univariate analysis. Items significantly associated with a high EPDS score of ≥ 9 were considered to indicate maternal mental disorder (P = 0.00; odds ratio [OR] 4.86, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.95–8.02, Standardized Coefficients [B] 1.58) and neonatal transport (P = 0.03, OR 3.98, 95% CI 1.14–13.9, B 1.38). Conversely, exclusive breastfeeding was significantly associated with a low EPDS score of ≤ 8 (P = 0.01, OR 0.65, 95% CI 0.48–0.87, B -0.44). (Table 3)

Table 2 Univariate analysis of the factors contributing to a high EPDS score
Table 3 Binary Logistic Regression Analysis (Forced Entry Method) of the factors that resulted in a high EPDS score

Risk assessment by presence or absence of mental disorders and its details

The group with mental disorders had a median EPDS of 10 in 85 women, and the group without mental disorders (i.e., 1540 women) had a median of 5. The group with mental disorders was characterized by more primipara, bottle-feeding, no partner, fewer pregnancy complications, maternal transport, preterm birth, urgent caesarean section, and exclusive breastfeeding (Table 4). This did not indicate that women with mental disorders had a lower risk of pregnancy complications, maternal transport, preterm birth, and urgent caesarean section, but rather was based on the institutional protocol at our hospital for women with high-risk pregnancies.

Table 4 Characteristics of the women with mental disorders

Women without mental disease were divided into high and low EPDS score groups, and univariate analysis of risk factors was performed (Table 5). There were 238 women with a high EPDS score of ≥ 9 points and 1302 women in the low-score group with ≤ 8 points. The rates of light for date, neonatal transport, bottle-feeding, and late visit were higher in the high-score group. Only the rate of exclusive breastfeeding was significantly higher in the low-score group. Binary logistic regression analysis (forced entry method) was performed using items for which significant differences were found in univariate analysis. Late visit (P = 0.02, OR 3.51, 95% CI 1.26–9.78, B 1.26) was significantly associated with a high EPDS score of ≥ 9 in patients without mental disorder. Conversely, exclusive breastfeeding (P = 0.002, OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.45–0.83, B -0.49) was significantly associated with the low-score group with EPDS ≤ 8 (Table 6).

Table 5 Chi-square test of the factors contributing to a high EPDS score in the women without mental disorder
Table 6 Binary Logistic Regression Analysis (Forced Entry Method) of the factors contributing to a high EPDS score in the women without mental disorders

Among the women with mental disorders, 46 were in the EPDS high-score group and 39 in the low-score group. There were no differences between the two groups for any of the items, similar to the other examinations (Table 7). There were no differences between the two groups in disease classification according to ICD-10, medication, and disease condition in the women with mental disorders (Table 8).

Table 7 Chi-square test of the factors contributing to a high EPDS score in the women with mental disorders
Table 8 Chi-square test of mental disorder characteristics contributing to a high EPDS score in women with mental disorders

Discussion

The primary findings revealed that risk factors contributing to elevated EPDS scores before intervention included maternal mental disorders and neonatal transport. However, distinct risk factors emerged when patients were categorized based on the presence or absence of mental disorders. In the group without mental disorders, a late visit was the sole significant risk factor for elevated EPDS scores. Conversely, risk factors associated with high EPDS scores were not identified in the group with mental disorders. This implies that the risk of postpartum depression seems to persist irrespective of the type or condition of mental disorders. Exclusive breastfeeding was strongly associated with low EPDS scores overall as well as in the group without mental disorders.

Maternal mental disorder

Maternal mental disorder is a well-established risk factor for postpartum depression [15, 19, 20]. In our study, EPDS scores tended to be high regardless of the type of mental illness. In some instances, the EPDS level was high even if the woman only had a past medical history and was not currently being managed with any medication. The history of mental illness was mainly self-reported by the woman, whereas some women did not list their past mental disorders on the questionnaire. It is important to recognize that a history of mental illness is a risk factor for postpartum depression and requires a detailed interview at the first visit. Women with mental disorders are more likely to have difficulty parenting because of their characteristics (e.g., clumsy or strength of commitment). In addition, it is known that the employment rate of women with mental disease is low [22], and many were not accompanied by a partner at our hospital. It is expected that these factors will potentiate difficulties in parenting and the life-long relationship. Women with a medical history of mental disease may face various difficulties, including postpartum depression, and thus require early mental, social, and economic intervention.

Neonatal transfer

According to the Cochrane systematic review by Moore et al. [23], early mother-infant contact effectively establishes mothers’ attachment behavior and mother-child interactions. The effect is shown not only during breastfeeding but also in many attachment behaviors, such as kissing after discharge. Neonatal transport deprives women of the opportunity to touch their infants early after birth, which may impede the mothers’ attachment. In addition, since neonatal transfer means that the infant presents with complications, it is natural that the mother’s anxiety increases.

Late visit

In Japan, the reasons for late visit have been literature-reviewed and include the following: 1.Economic reasons, 2. Unawareness of pregnancy, 3. No one to consult with, 4. Busy schedule, 5. Aware of pregnancy but neglected it, 6. Lack of knowledge or uncertainty about what to do, 7. Family situations (divorce, domestic violence, infidelity), 8. Undecided about childbirth, 9. Illegal residence, homelessness, 10. Planned abortion [24]. These backgrounds include fetal neglect, unwanted pregnancies, social isolation, etc., making it not hard to imagine the potential risk of postpartum depression.

Late visit in the overall population and neonatal transport in the group without mental disorders did not reach statistical significance in the multivariate analysis, with a wide 95% confidence interval. However, there is a potential for these factors to become significant risk factors with an increase in the number of cases.

Exclusive breastfeeding

In this study, many women exclusively breastfed in the low EPDS group. However, the causal relationship is unclear; exclusive breastfeeding may provide mental stability, or mental stability may enable exclusive breastfeeding. Oxytocin is a peptide hormone secreted by the posterior pituitary gland. It is secreted in response to cervical and uterine elongation during labor and nipple stimulation from breastfeeding, causing muscle fibers in the mammary gland to contract and promote lactation [25]. Oxytocin reduces cortisol, which is secreted in response to stress, but in women with postpartum depressive symptoms, the oxytocin levels during pregnancy and lactation are low [26, 27] or poorly regulated [28]. There are numerous reports on the early interruption of breastfeeding and postpartum depression [29,30,31,32,33], suggesting the involvement of oxytocin. However, the direct relationship between oxytocin and postpartum depression is unknown. The genotype and the reaction of oxytocin with glucocorticoids may be involved in a complicated manner [34,35,36,37]. Breastfeeding may have a positive effect on maternal mental health, but in rare circumstances, considerable stress can be induced by the obsession with exclusive breastfeeding or its failure. Breastfeeding is impaired due to maternal perception of not having a sufficient amount of milk, infant’s failure to thrive, mastitis, etc. [38].. Breastfeeding failure has been reported to be associated with shame and guilt [39]. Therefore, we need to maximize breastfeeding support, but we should not force it.

Strengths and limitations

The strength of this study lies in the data from a population not subjected to systematic interventions for preventing postpartum depression, allowing for the extraction of true risk factors. Additionally, we examined the differences in risk based on the presence or absence of mental disorders and their specifics.

This study has three limitations. First, this survey was conducted at a university hospital where many women had high-risk pregnancies, and therefore the results may differ from those of the general population. Second, several results with significant differences (mental disorder, neonatal transport, late visit) had wide 95% CI, indicating the need for further investigation with a larger population. Third, we were unable to follow up after the one-month postpartum medical examination. Although the EPDS is a highly accurate tool for predicting postpartum depression, it is important to note that it is a questionnaire-based screening tool and not a diagnostic assessment by a medical professional. It is unknown how many of the 284 people with high EPDS scores developed postnatal depression. It is important for early detection in the women who are more likely to present with perinatal mental health problems and intervene appropriately before severe symptoms develop.

Conclusion

In our facility, it has been identified that the risk factors for postpartum depression include maternal mental disorders, neonatal transport, and late visits. Additionally, the successful establishment of exclusive breastfeeding has been suggested to have the potential for preventing postpartum depression.

Since 2017, we have been utilizing the findings of this survey as a reference to develop and implement a risk assessment tool, incorporating high EPDS scores. Women identified as high risk for mental health issues undergo interviews, and social support is coordinated. We also provide assistance to women aiming for exclusive breastfeeding to ensure the successful attainment of that goal. Further research is needed to investigate whether proactive interventions based on these risk factors can effectively reduce the incidence of postpartum depression.

Data availability

Not applicable.

Abbreviations

EPDS:

Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale

NICU:

neonatal intensive care unit

ICD:

International Classification of Diseases

OR:

odds ratio

CI:

confidence interval

References

  1. Takeda S. Ninsanpushibou Zeroheno chousen. [Challenge to zero maternal death]. Nissanpushi. 2016;68:1815–22.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Moehler E, Brunner R, Wiebel A, Reck C, Resch F. Maternal depressive symptoms in the postnatal period are associated with long-term impairment of mother-child bonding. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2006;9:273–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Tsuchida A, Hamazaki K, Matsumura K, Miura K, Kasamatsu H, Inadera H. Changes in the association between postpartum depression and mother-infant bonding by parity: longitudinal results from the Japan Environment and Children’s study. J Psychiatr Res. 2019;110:110–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ethier L, Lacharite C, Couture G. Childhood adversity, parental stress, and depression of negligent mothers. Child Abuse Negl. 1995;19:619–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Murray L, Arteche A, Fearon P, Halligan S, Goodyer I, Cooper P. Maternal postnatal depression and the development of depression in offspring up to 16 years of age. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2011;50:460–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Van Ijzendoorn M, Schuengel C, Bakermans-Kranenburg MJ. Disorganized attachment in early childhood: meta-analysis of precursors, concomitants, and sequelae. Dev Psychopathol. 1999;11:225–49.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cicchetti D, Rogosch FA, Toth SL. Fostering secure attachment in infants in maltreating families through preventive interventions. Dev Psychopathol. 2006;18:623–49.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Schechter DS, Zygmunt A, Trabka KA, Davies M, Colon E, Kolodji A, McCaw JE. Child mental representations of attachment when mothers are traumatized: the relationship of family-drawings to story-stem completion. J Early Child Infant Psychol. 2007;3:119–41.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Liu X, Wang S, Wang G. Prevalence and risk factors of postpartum depression in women: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Nurs. 2022;31:2665–77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Tokumitsu K, Sugawara N, Maruo K, Suzuki T, Shimoda K, Yasui-Furukori N. Prevalence of perinatal depression among Japanese women: a meta-analysis. Ann Gen Psychiatry. 2020;19:41.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Bloch M, Daly RC, Rubinow DR. Endocrine factors in the etiology of postpartum depression. Compr Psychiatry. 2003;44:234–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hendrick V, Altshuler LL, Suri R. Hormonal changes in the postpartum and implications for postpartum depression. Psychosomatics. 1998;39:93–101.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Glynn LM, Davis EP, Sandman CA. New insights into the role of perinatal HPA-axis dysregulation in postpartum depression. Neuropeptides. 2013;47:363–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Jolley SN, Elmore S, Barnard KE, Carr DB. Dysregulation of the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis in postpartum depression. Biol Res Nurs. 2007;8:210–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. O’Hara MW. Postpartum depression: what we know. J Clin Psychol. 2009;65:1258–69.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Robertson E, Grace S, Wallington T, Stewart DE. Antenatal risk factors for postpartum depression: a synthesis of recent literature. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2004;26:289–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Fortner RT, Pekow P, Dole N, Markenson G, Chasan-Taber L. Risk factors for prenatal depressive symptoms among hispanic women. Matern Child Health J. 2011;15:1287–95.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Le Strat Y, Dubertret C, Le Foll B. Prevalence and correlates of major depressive episode in pregnant and postpartum women in the United States. J Affect Disord. 2011;135:128–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Tachibana Y, Koizumi T, Takehara K, Kakee N, Tsujii H, Mori R. Antenatal risk factors of postpartum depression at 20 weeks gestation in a Japanese sample: psychosocial perspectives from a Cohort study in Tokyo. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0142410.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Nakano M, Sourander A, Luntamo T, Chudal R, Skokauskas N, Kaneko H. Early risk factors for postpartum depression: a longitudinal Japanese population-based study. J Affect Disord. 2020;269:148–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Okano S, Murata M, Masuike S, et al. Nihongoban Ezinbara Sangoutsubyou Hyoukahyou (EPDS) no shinraisei to datousei. [Reliability and Validity of the Japanese Version of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) ] Seishinkashindangaku. 1996;7:525–33.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Sasaki N, Sato A, Yamaguchi S, et al. Development of a scale to assess motivation for competitive employment among persons with severe mental illness. PLoS ONE. 2018;13:e0204809.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Moore ER, Anderson GC, Bergman N. Early skin-to-skin contact for mothers and their healthy newborn infants. Cochrane Database Sys Rev. 2007; 18.

  24. Shinmasu Y, Sakasegawa M, Morikawa M, Sumihara K. Mijushinninpu no haikeiyouin Ni kansuru bunkentekikousatsu. [A review of the literature on factors and reasons why some pregnant women do not have prenatal care]. Nurs J Osaka Aoyama Univ. 2020;3:11–9.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Chiras DD. Human Biology. 7th ed. Sudbury, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Stuebe AM, Grewen K, Meltzer-Brody S. Association between maternal mood and oxytocin response to breastfeeding. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2013;22:352–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Skrundz M, Bolten M, Nast I, Hellhammer DH, Meinlschmidt G. Plasma oxytocin concentration during pregnancy is associated with development of postpartum depression. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2011;36:1886–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Cox EQ, Stuebe A, Pearson B, Grewen K, Rubinow D, Meltzer-Brody S. Oxytocin and HPA stress axis reactivity in postpartum women. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2015;55:164–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Hamdan A, Tamim H. The relationship between postpartum depression and breastfeeding. Int J Psychiatry Med. 2012;43:243–59.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Lara-Cinisomo S, McKenney K, Di Florio A, Meltzer-Brody S. Associations between postpartum depression, breastfeeding and oxytocin levels in Latina mothers. Breastfeed Med. 2017;12:436–42.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Dias CC, Figueiredo B. Breastfeeding and depression: a systematic review of the literature. J Affect Disord. 2015;171:142–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Saliva CS, Lima MC, Sequeira-de-Andrade LAS, Oliveira JS, Monteiro JS, Lima NMS. Association between postpartum depression and the practice of exclusive breastfeeding in the first three months of life. J Pediatr (Rio J). 2017;93:356–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Borra C, Iacovou M, Sevilla A. New evidence on breastfeeding and postpartum depression: the importance of understanding women’s intentions. Matern Child Health J. 2015;19:897–907.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Feng C, Hackett PD, DeMarco AC, Chen X, Stair S, Haroon E. Oxytocin and vasopressin effects on the neural response to social cooperation are modulated by sex in humans. Brain Imaging Behav. 2015;9:754–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. McQuaid RJ, Mcinnis QA, Abizaid A, Anisman H. Making room for oxytocin in understanding depression. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2014;45:305–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Rilling JK, Demarco AC, Hackett PD, Chen X, Gautam P, Stair S. Sex differences in the neural and behavioral response to intranasal oxytocin and vasopressin during human social interaction. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2014;39:237–48.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Brummelte S, Galea LA. Postpartum depression: etiology, treatment and consequences for maternal care. Horm Befav. 2016;77:153–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Gianni ML, Bettinelli ME, Mosca F, et al. Breastfeeding difficulties and risk for early breastfeeding cessation. Neutrient. 2019;11:2266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Jackson L, De Pascalis L, Harrold J, Fallon V. Guilt, shame, and postpartum infant feeding outcomes: a systematic review. Matern Child Nutr. 2021;17:e13141.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank to the perinatal mental health care team for collecting the data and midwives in our ward for providing excellent care to perinatal women. This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Tomomi Shiga: Conceptualisation; Data curation; Formal analysis; Investigation; Methodology; Roles/Writing - original draft. Tatsuro Furui: Project administration. Ken-ichirou Morishige: Supervision; Validation; All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tomomi Shiga.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This research has been approved by the Ethics Review Committee of the Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine (29–107). All data were anonymized and participants were given the opportunity to refuse participation by opting out.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shiga, T., Furui, T. & Morishige, Ki. Examination of risk factors for high Edinburgh postnatal depression scale scores: a retrospective study at a single university hospital in Japan. matern health, neonatol and perinatol 10, 6 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40748-024-00176-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40748-024-00176-6

Keywords